Worst. Game. Ever.

What do you think is the worst game ever? Give reasons.

I'm tied between three.. Deadly Towers and Dragon's Lair were very awful and horrible games but they never were great franchises (if they were franchises that is).. But when an awesome franchise produce something so awful, especially if it's from Konami, it's unacceptable..



I hate that game.. XD

any megaman game

furball006 wrote:

any megaman game

That's insulting. XD

lol i said it just for you i really cant think of the worst game i ever played

i think its haze...soo much hype for nothing... i even pre-ordered it but i stoped after playing it for 5 min and returned it the very next day...thank god for the "return in 7 days after release for full refund" deal and with that refund i per-ordered MGS4

Which further proves my theory on hyping games. So in conclusion, PEOPLE NEED TO STOP HYPING GAMES.

well hyping a game is okay its when they over hype a game saying bold statements such as "Halo Killer" thats when it becomes a problem and i think they're digging their own grave when they do that since if it fails, fans will be turned off when they see a certain company name on the box cause it brings back bad memories about previous titles.

Hands down, Saints Row1/2

Remo wrote:

Hands down, Saints Row1/2

Please give reasons.

Rey wrote:

Remo wrote:

Hands down, Saints Row1/2

Please give reasons.

Ok,

Horribly made.
Storyline is garbage.
Game just looks bad.

All though thats not a huge problem, there are "Other" games out there that are better. Why play saints row when you can play GTA4, heck even GTA San Andreas looks better and plays better than saints row.


Honestly, the game just feels horrible. When you play it your not really enjoying yourself. Thats how I feel anyways.

Ah, another person judging the game based on the GRAPHICS..

If you actually PLAYED Saint Row 2, you'll notice that the gameplay is far far FAR better than it looks. it tops GTAIV easily in my opinion.

Seriously, Might aswell compare LittleBigPlanet to Super Mario Bros. and say LBP is better because it has better GRAPHICS. Oh, just to note, LBP does kick bumm though..

the ending wasnt all that bad either. BANG right in the teeth, i like sr2 betterthan gta 4 it more fun, gta is to serious and builds up until you think your going to get an awsome ending then you get fed the garbage rockstar craped out.

ghost recon 2
sucks big time

BlackWidow wrote:

ghost recon 2
sucks big time

I thought it was pretty good, I liked how it was EVER more advanced than cod4

Ghost Recon is O.K. but Fusion Frenzy 2...different story.

Rey wrote:

Ah, another person judging the game based on the GRAPHICS..

If you actually PLAYED Saint Row 2, you'll notice that the gameplay is far far FAR better than it looks. it tops GTAIV easily in my opinion.

Seriously, Might aswell compare LittleBigPlanet to Super Mario Bros. and say LBP is better because it has better GRAPHICS. Oh, just to note, LBP does kick bumm though..

Now Now, if you didn't want peoples opinions, why did you ask in the first place!?

You're intitled to your opinion, I'm only countering the argument if you get what I'm saying.

Example: Lets say someone hates Super Mario Bros. and when I ask him why, he says "because it's 8-bit." It's not a reason to hate a game, is it? that's why I said give good reasons.

I know your opinion won't change, but I can point out the flaw if your reasons.

Rey wrote:

You're intitled to your opinion, I'm only countering the argument if you get what I'm saying.

Example: Lets say someone hates Super Mario Bros. and when I ask him why, he says "because it's 8-bit." It's not a reason to hate a game, is it? that's why I said give good reasons.

I know your opinion won't change, but I can point out the flaw if your reasons.

There is no such thing as a flawed opinion.

People can hate Super Mario Bros just because Mario wears a hat, or because his clothes are red. It's plenty enough reason to hate something.

When you ask someone for their opinion, don't put rules and regulations on what the opinion can contain. Your basically asking for biased responses. The way you have it if they don't provide reasons that meet your standards, then they are wrong.

Unfortunantly, thats not how it works.

My bad, I meant countering the argument, not the opinion.

You hate a game, that's your opinion, you don't have to give reasons for it. HOWEVER! I'm asking about what you think is the worst game ever. I believe there's a difference between them. Example: I hate MegaMan X7. It's a decent game but I hate it. However, I think Bomberman is the WORST game ever because it took everything fun about Bomberman out and added some weird new dimension of challenge to it that not even a challenge whore would sit through it. (you'll only get that if you played it XD)

You hate SA2, that should have no argument. You think it's the worst game ever because of graphics, I don't think that's a fair argument, you see.

Hope you get where I'm going with this.

Gears of War is a sweet game, and so is the second one. But the online play sucked but the campaign was sick as frick though.

But as for the worst game, I would have to say "The Club" the most stupidest game ever.

Remo wrote:

Rey wrote:

You're intitled to your opinion, I'm only countering the argument if you get what I'm saying.

Example: Lets say someone hates Super Mario Bros. and when I ask him why, he says "because it's 8-bit." It's not a reason to hate a game, is it? that's why I said give good reasons.

I know your opinion won't change, but I can point out the flaw if your reasons.

There is no such thing as a flawed opinion.

People can hate Super Mario Bros just because Mario wears a hat, or because his clothes are red. It's plenty enough reason to hate something.

When you ask someone for their opinion, don't put rules and regulations on what the opinion can contain. Your basically asking for biased responses. The way you have it if they don't provide reasons that meet your standards, then they are wrong.

Unfortunantly, thats not how it works.

well, uh....... opinions can be wrong, here is a loose example of this

lets say johnny has spent his entire life roofing, he has full mobility of his body and is a virtuoso at what he does

lets say jimmy has no arms or legs

now lets say a third party comes in and states that his opinion is jimmy is a better roofer because hes nicer then johnny

thats the third parties opinion, but it certainly isn't right is it, and the reasoning is flawed

so ya contrary to popular belief, opinions can be wrong, and this is my opinion on this subject

and if youre opinion is the opposite of this, and you maintain that opinions cant be wrong... you and i have exact opposite views on this, and one of us is right and one is wrong.......

that alone prooves my point

Furball.. what would I do without you.. XD

Quote :

But as for the worst game, I would have to say "The Club" the most stupidest game ever.

I didn't play the game, but the idea is strange.. racing + shooter?

Rey wrote:

My bad, I meant countering the argument, not the opinion.

You hate a game, that's your opinion, you don't have to give reasons for it. HOWEVER! I'm asking about what you think is the worst game ever. I believe there's a difference between them. Example: I hate MegaMan X7. It's a decent game but I hate it. However, I think Bomberman is the WORST game ever because it took everything fun about Bomberman out and added some weird new dimension of challenge to it that not even a challenge whore would sit through it. (you'll only get that if you played it XD)

You hate SA2, that should have no argument. You think it's the worst game ever because of graphics, I don't think that's a fair argument, you see.

Hope you get where I'm going with this.

I don't hate it becuase of just the graphics man.

It's like a 2002 game released in 2008. It's friggin horrible in every way. Sure it has lots of things to do, but whats the point really. It's a bad game in every way, shape, form, and fasion.

It needs to be thrown in an incinerator with games like the Postal series and Deer Hunter series.

furball006 wrote:

Remo wrote:

Rey wrote:

You're intitled to your opinion, I'm only countering the argument if you get what I'm saying.

Example: Lets say someone hates Super Mario Bros. and when I ask him why, he says "because it's 8-bit." It's not a reason to hate a game, is it? that's why I said give good reasons.

I know your opinion won't change, but I can point out the flaw if your reasons.

There is no such thing as a flawed opinion.

People can hate Super Mario Bros just because Mario wears a hat, or because his clothes are red. It's plenty enough reason to hate something.

When you ask someone for their opinion, don't put rules and regulations on what the opinion can contain. Your basically asking for biased responses. The way you have it if they don't provide reasons that meet your standards, then they are wrong.

Unfortunantly, thats not how it works.

well, uh....... opinions can be wrong, here is a loose example of this

lets say johnny has spent his entire life roofing, he has full mobility of his body and is a virtuoso at what he does

lets say jimmy has no arms or legs

now lets say a third party comes in and states that his opinion is jimmy is a better roofer because hes nicer then johnny

thats the third parties opinion, but it certainly isn't right is it, and the reasoning is flawed

so ya contrary to popular belief, opinions can be wrong, and this is my opinion on this subject

and if youre opinion is the opposite of this, and you maintain that opinions cant be wrong... you and i have exact opposite views on this, and one of us is right and one is wrong.......

that alone prooves my point

Your not wrong and I'm not wrong.

Your opinon is exactly that.

Understand?

Why do people allways have to try and prove someones opinions right or wrong. Is it a need to feel better about themselves, more justified, or feel more superior? I mean seriously, does someone allways have to be right, and someone allways have to be wrong?

Opinion: the view somebody takes about a certain issue, especially when it is based solely on personal judgment.

If opinions could be right and wrong, it would go against everything that defines "Opinion". Personal judgement is the whole driving point for opinions. Without it, sure they could be right or wrong, but thats just not the case.

So I'll type it out in big bold letters so it's easy to read. The one phrase that destroys Right and Wrong debates over opinions.

Your opinon is exactly that.

Remo wrote:

I don't hate it becuase of just the graphics man.

It's like a 2002 game released in 2008. It's friggin horrible in every way. Sure it has lots of things to do, but whats the point really. It's a bad game in every way, shape, form, and fasion.

It needs to be thrown in an incinerator with games like the Postal series and Deer Hunter series.

But... Dear Hunter was a great game! XD

See, I hate it when people judge a game cause of how it "looks" that's why I'm making a big deal out of it. xp

"Looks is not what makes the game, it never was." that's one of the reasons why I worship Capcom.